Mexico v. United States of America Consulting counsel to Mexico before the International Court of Justice at the Hague
Bullis v. Saint Anthony’s Hospital Mr. Warner worked for the surviving husband of a wife admitted to the heart wing of a hospital by a doctor not authorized to do that.
Beasley v. State of Texas Death sentence overturned for client who had confessed to killing a police officer
If you are not satisfied with the result of your trial, you have remedies. An appeal is a review by at least three judges to decide whether the party that had to prove something in a trial, actually proved it, and whether the trial was fair.
You should know that there is only a short period of time to file a notice of appeal, or motion for new trial, sometimes only seven days. It is important that you act soon.
Call us today. We can help.
Recent Cases
Mexico v. United States of America
In Mexico v. United States of America, Mr. Warner was consulting counsel to Mexico before the International Court of Justice at the Hague. The death sentence of his client, Roberto Moreno Ramos, and those of more than fifty other Mexican nationals, was set aside. President Bush intervened and the Supreme Court of the United States sent the cases back to the state courts for reconsideration.
Beasley v. State
In Beasley v. State, Mr. Warner persuaded the Court to reverse the conviction and death sentence of his client, who had confessed to killing a policeman during a burglary. Mr. Warner worked on the appeal for six years and won a new trial for his client.
Bullis v. Saint Anthony’s Hospital
In Bullis v. Saint Anthony’s Hospital, Mr. Warner worked on a case for the surviving husband of a young wife who was admitted to the heart wing of the hospital by a doctor not authorized to do that and who administered a drug intravenously which should have been given orally. She suffered in a vegetative state and then died. The matter settled.
Carrera v. State
In Carrera v. State, Mr. Warner convinced the Court to reverse the conviction and sentence in another capital murder conviction. Although three people were killed, Mr. Warner convinced the Court that the trial judge’s explanation of the law was so erroneous that the trial was unconstitutionally unfair. Mr. Warner got his client a new trial.
U.S.A. v. Cuellar
In U.S.A. v. Cuellar, Mr. Warner persuaded the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was involuntary, so the defendant was allowed to appeal even though the prosecutor did not want him to appeal. He also convinced the Court of Appeals that the trial judge made a serious mistake in raising the sentence. The Court of Appeals sent the case back for a lower sentence.
Maydon v. State
In Maydon v. State, Mr. Warner convinced the Court of Appeals that the state would violate the constitutional prohibitions on double jeopardy if it attempted to try the defendant the second time after a mistrial. Mr. Warner persuaded the Court of Appeals to prohibit a second trial and the defendant went free.