Mexico v. United States of America Consulting counsel to Mexico before the International Court of Justice at the Hague
Bullis v. Saint Anthony’s Hospital Mr. Warner worked for the surviving husband of a wife admitted to the heart wing of a hospital by a doctor not authorized to do that.
Beasley v. State of Texas Death sentence overturned for client who had confessed to killing a police officer
If you are not satisfied with the result of your trial, you have remedies. An appeal is a review by at least three judges to decide whether the party that had to prove something in a trial, actually proved it, and whether the trial was fair.
You should know that there is only a short period of time to file a notice of appeal, or motion for new trial, sometimes only seven days. It is important that you act soon.
Call us today. We can help.
Recent Cases
Hodges v. State
In Hodges v. State, Mr. Warner persuaded the Court of Appeals that the defendant had not received effective assistance of counsel at trial. The Court of Appeals remanded the matter to the trial court for a new proceeding.
Logan v. State
In Logan v. State, Mr. Warner convinced the Court of Criminal Appeals to reject the state’s petition. Mr. Warner prevailed on his interpretation of the statute. In this arson matter involving well over a hundred thousand dollars, the state wanted his client convicted of a felony. Mr. Warner persuaded the Court of Criminal Appeals that probation for a misdemeanor was the legal sentence.
State v. Mondragon
In State v. Mondragon, which was the defendant’s sixth felony trial for driving while intoxicated, Mr. Warner persuaded the trial jury to find his client not guilty, even though the client was driving on the wrong side of the road at two o’clock in the morning.
State v. Hinojosa
In State v. Hinojosa, Mr. Warner convinced the trial jury to find his client not guilty of murder, even though the defendant was found by standing over the body with a gun.
State v. Camacho and Ybarra
In State v. Camacho and Ybarra, Mr. Warner convinced the Court of Appeals to grant a new trial because the trial judge had considered illegal evidence. This was despite the fact that the defendants had pleaded guilty to possession of a ton of marijuana when another lawyer represented them.
State v. Perez
In State v. Perez, Mr. Warner persuaded the Court of Appeals that a statute was unconstitutional. Even though the jury found the defendant guilty, the Court of Appeals ordered a new trial.